 |
Copyright Infringement
Dunbar v. Gottwald
U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal. (2007)
The Firm represented clients Tommy Dunbar, co-founder and songwriter for the pop group THE RUBINOOS, and co-writer James Gangwer, in a lawsuit against pop superstar Avril Lavigne and her producer and co-writer Lukasz (“Dr. Luke”) Gottwald for copyright infringement, alleging that the Lavigne/Gottwald song “Girlfriend,” which was a No. 1 worldwide hit song for much of 2007, infringed on The Rubinoos’ 1979 hit song “I Wanna Be Your Boyfriend,” written by Dunbar and Gangwer. The controversy drew wide media attention, and is the first high profile song infringement case known to have been played out on the internet. The controversy engendered dozens of YouTube videos independently created by fans of both sides comparing the two songs, which became the most-viewed videos on YouTube for several weeks, and popular sites such as AOL and TMZ ran internet polls asking users whether they thought Lavigne and Gottwald had copied from the Rubinoos (the majority of both polls said “yes”). The case was settled in December 2007 on confidential terms.
Unpaid Record Producer Royalties
Guercio v. Chicago Records
Los Angeles Superior Court (2005)
The Firm represented James William Guercio, a Grammy Award winning producer of the band CHICAGO, in a lawsuit against the CHICAGO band members and their record company. The action alleged breach of the parties’ agreement and also sought recovery of unpaid royalties and other monies. The band counterclaimed, alleging that client had improperly withheld consent to various licensing opportunities. Following a jury trial and an accounting, the Firm obtained a judgment for almost $1 million in favor of the client and also prevailed on the counterclaim. The matter later settled on confidential terms.
Trademark Infringement
Doobie Brothers v. Paul Curcio, et al.
U.S. District Court, M.D. Fl. (2004)
The Firm represented the renowned classic rock band DOOBIE BROTHERS in a suit against Florida-based promoter Paul Curcio and three former members of the band to prevent them from touring and promoting themselves as the "Original" DOOBIE BROTHERS in violation of federal trademark law. The Firm successfully obtained a Preliminary Injunction on short notice, following a hearing in which the court praised the firm's work and preparation. In further proceedings, the firm was successful in having the defendants held in contempt of the injunction and obtaining an award of attorney's fees. The Firm eventually obtained entry of a permanent injunction and a money judgment in excess of $1 Million, later upheld by the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals.
Band Partnership Dispute
Dead Kennedys v. Jello Biafra
San Francisco Superior Court (2003)
The Firm represented the legendary punk rock band DEAD KENNEDYS and achieved a "complete victory" on appeal brought by the band's former frontman Jello Biafra from a jury verdict in client's favor following a three-week trial. The appellate decision upheld over $200,000 in compensatory and punitive damages, together with the band's right to continue to control all of its creative works and musical properties. In related federal court proceedings, the Firm successfully argued to remand the action to state court, convincing the federal court to award the firm's clients attorneys’ fees and costs for having to fight off removal of their action from state court. The case was the subject of feature articles in the S.F. Weekly, S.F. Examiner, and Spin Magazine. Following conclusion of the trial, the band went back out on the road for the first time in 16 years. The New Yorker magazine later published a feature on the band's tour.
Jerry Garcia Estate Settlement
Carolyn Garcia v. Estate of Garcia
Marin County Superior Court (1999)
In a case nationally televised on Court TV, the Firm successfully represented Carolyn "Mountain Girl" Garcia, ex-wife of the late Jerry Garcia of Grateful Dead fame, in a lawsuit against Jerry's estate to enforce a property settlement agreement entered into by the late musician and his former wife. Praising the quality of Ms. Garcia's representation by Phillips, Erlewine & Given LLP, the Court awarded Ms. Garcia attorney's fees and the right to the remainder of the dissolution agreement, totaling more than $4.5 million. The case was followed by local and national media, broadcast live on CourtTV, and covered by leading news outlets including The New York Times, CNN, The San Francisco Chronicle and The American Lawyer. Following settlement of Ms. Garcia's claims against the estate, the Firm took on the representation of the majority of Jerry Garcia's heirs (including his daughters and brother), and later helped to establish the Jerry Garcia Estate LLC for the post-estate administration of Jerry's invaluable intellectual property rights.
Music Merchandising License Dispute
Winterland v. Bolton
U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal. (1999)
Client, the nation’s then-largest music industry merchandiser, sued popular musical performer Michael Bolton to recover seven figures in unrecouped royalties under a merchandise contract when Bolton failed to release a “studio album” within a specified period and tour as required by the contract.” The case settled on terms favorable to the client.
Unpaid Management Commissions
Ahern v. Scholz
U.S. District Court, D. Mass. (1996)
The Firm represented Paul Ahern, former manager of the band BOSTON, in a lawsuit against the band's lead guitarist to enforce his contractual rights to royalties. After prevailing at trial and obtaining a monetary judgment in excess of $1 Million, the client's claims were upheld by the First Circuit Court of Appeals. The decision of the trial court was the subject of a feature article in the Entertainment Law Update section of California Law Business Magazine.
“Big Soul” v. Tobin
California Labor Commissioner (1996)
The Firm successfully represents Client, the former manager of such acts as TIFFANY, in a proceeding against him before the California Labor Commission under the state’s Talent Agencies Act. The decision is considered so unusual that the leading commentator in the field reprints the decision in full in his monthly report, terming it “a rare victory for personal managers.” See 19 Entertainment L. Rptr. 8:11 (January 1998).
|
